Identification of Livable HousingComparison of Standards and Actual Conditions in Pringombo Hamlet, Natah, Nglipar, Gunungkidul
Identifikasi Rumah Layak HuniPerbandingan Standar dan Kondisi Faktual di Dusun Pringombo, Natah, Nglipar, Gunungkidul
Keywords:
Habitable Housing, Pringombo Village, Building Safety, Environmental Health, Space AdequacyAbstract
This study aims to identify the housing conditions in Pringombo Village and compare them with the standards for habitable housing as stipulated in government regulations, Law No. 1 of 2011 (the main legal basis for habitable housing) and Ministerial Decree No. 403/KPTS/M/2002 (technical standards for the construction of healthy housing). The research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach to provide an in-depth depiction of actual conditions. Data collection took place in Pringombo Village during the 2024 survey period using interview, observation, and documentation techniques. The informants consisted of 12 homeowners selected based on criteria indicating housing conditions requiring improvement, particularly in terms of ventilation and building structure. Data were analyzed using the qualitative analysis method proposed by Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the majority of houses do not yet meet the standards for habitable housing, especially with regard to building safety, environmental health, and adequacy of space. As many as 66.7% of the houses have roof heights of less than 3 meters, which affects air circulation and thermal comfort. In addition, most houses still have inadequate bathroom facilities, with sanitation that does not meet health standards. However, access to electricity and the receipt of social assistance reflect government efforts to support the local community. This study illustrates that the main challenges in achieving habitable housing in Pringombo Hamlet include limited infrastructure, low community awareness, and geographical conditions. The findings are expected to serve as a reference for local governments in designing more effective and sustainable programs to improve substandard housing.
References
1. Darma, K. A. S. (2020). Prinsip Pengendalian Pasif Fisika Bangunan Rumah Tradisional Bale Saka Roras. Vitruvian, 9(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.22441/vitruvian.2020.v9i2.005
2. Di, S., Gunung, D., Kecamatan, S., Kabupaten, B., Utara, B., Upe, A., & Jabar, A. S. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM BANTUAN RUMAH LAYAK HUNI KEPADA MASYARAKAT KURANG MAMPU 322 ribu jiwa , angak ini meningkat sebesar 12 ribu jiwa di bandingkan tahun 2022 . mencukupi kebutuhan pokok sehingga kurang mampu untuk menjansin perumahan layak huni untuk mas. 5(1), 89–98.
3. Harahap, T. (2021). Komparasi Indikator Rumah Layak Huni dan Permukiman Kumuh Indonesia. Journal of Science and Applicative Technology, 5(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.35472/jsat.v5i1.426
4. Kemenkes. (2023). Laporan Tahunan : Pengamanan Kualitas Air Minum Tahun 2022.
5. Kementrian PUPR. (2017). Rumah Layak Huni.
6. Keputusan Menteri (KEPMEN) 403 Tahun 2002: Kecukupan Luas Minimum Bangunan.
7. Mardila Purwanti, O., & Sujianto. (2023). Implementasi Kegiatan Rehabilitasi Rumah Layak Huni di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(3), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i2.949
8. Maulida, A., Shofie, T., Prianto, E., & Semarang, U. D. (2024). KETANGGUHAN TERMAL : MENGANALISIS. 171–177.
9. Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative-Data-Analysis, A Method Sourcebook. Sage.
10. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 492/MENKES/PER/IV/2010 tentang Persyaratan Kualitas Air Minum
11. Peraturan Menteri Negara Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor: 22/Permen/M/2008 tentang standar rumah layak huni
12. Putra, H. M. A., & Hakim, B. R. (2021). Analisis Luas Bangunan Dan Faktor Sekunder Penentu Kenyamanan Rumah Tinggal Sederhana. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 5(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v5i1.608
13. S. Di, D. Gunung, S. K. et al. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM BANTUAN RUMAH LAYAK HUNI KEPADA MASYARAKAT KURANG MAMPU 322 ribu jiwa , angak ini meningkat sebesar 12 ribu jiwa di bandingkan tahun 2022 . mencukupi kebutuhan pokok sehingga kurang mampu untuk menjansin perumahan layak huni untuk mas. 5(1), 89–98. https://welvaart.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/9
14. Sari, A. G. P. (2022). Strategi Pembangunan Rumah Layak Huni (Rulahu) Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Kabupaten Jayapura, Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 14(2), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.33701/jiapd.v14i2.2843
15. Sipil, J. T., Teknik, F., & Malikussaleh, U. (2023). Kajian besaran dan perabotan pada.
16. Suryo, M. S. (2017). Analisa Kebutuhan Luas Minimal Pola Rumah Sederhana Tapak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Permukiman, 12(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2017.12.116-123
